National Police Race Action Plan fails to deliver meaningful change, damning report says
A five-year independent review finds limited progress in policing, with little meaningful change for Black communities
A flagship police reform programme launched in the wake of the global Black Lives Matter protests has failed to deliver the level of change promised to Black communities, according to a damning new report.
An assessment by the Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board (ISOB), which monitored the Police Race Action Plan (PRAP) over five years, concludes that progress has been “not enough, not fast enough, and not in the ways that matter most”.
The findings cut through years of official rhetoric, exposing a gap between ambition and reality that will feel familiar to many.
Barrister Abimbola Johnson, the board’s chair, is unequivocal in her assessment of what five years of independent scrutiny has produced, writing in the report’s foreword: “The honest answer, at the end of those five years, is: not enough, not fast enough, and not in the ways that matter most to the communities this work was created to serve.”
Launched in 2021 following the murder of George Floyd and renewed scrutiny of UK policing, the Race Action Plan was meant to transform how forces engage with Black communities.
Instead, the report paints a picture of uneven change, driven more by individuals than systems.
At its core, the issue is structural. Racism in policing is not simply about individual behaviour, but embedded in systems, culture and decision-making, the report states.
Yet many forces have been reluctant to publicly acknowledge that reality. As of March 2026, only six out of 44 police forces had formally accepted the existence of institutional racism: Avon & Somerset, Bedfordshire, British Transport Police, Dorset Police, Gloucestershire and South Wales Police.
Without that baseline, meaningful reform becomes difficult to sustain, let alone scale nationally.
Instead, policing has often defaulted to safer ground. Training, consultation and strategy documents have multiplied, but the report questions whether these efforts have led to tangible improvements in people’s lived experiences.
Forces have been “better at producing action plans than demonstrating their impact”, contributing to concerns that engagement with Black communities is sometimes more performative than transformative.
Trust remains low, with one poll suggesting only 46% of Black people in England trust the police compared to 64% of white adults.
The report stresses that confidence cannot be rebuilt through messaging alone, but through sustained behavioural change.
There are examples of progress. For example, some forces have improved transparency and data collection. British Transport Police, for instance, reduced gaps in ethnicity data in stop and search through stronger accountability.
However, these remain isolated rather than systemic. Progress is often tied to individual leaders and, when they move on, momentum stalls.
Without embedded structures and enforceable standards, change remains fragile, the report suggests.
The Race Action Plan itself was voluntary, with no legal requirement, enforcement mechanism or consistent oversight from central government.
As a result, progress has depended heavily on the willingness of individual forces to engage.
The ISOB is now urging the Home Office to plan for what comes next, including funding independent watchdogs and community groups to continue holding policing to account beyond March 2026.
It also identifies internal police culture, including resistance and defensiveness, as a key barrier to change.
The report singles out the Metropolitan Police Service as a persistent flashpoint, asking: “How do you solve a problem like the Met?”
For every year of the PRAP, the force was embroiled in a high-profile race-related scandal.
Britain’s largest police force has remained at the centre of repeated controversies, from the strip-search of Child Q to findings of institutional racism in the Casey Review and Dr Shereen Daniels’ ‘30 Patterns of Harm’ review.
One senior figure quoted in the report describes the force as “incredibly insular and self-focused”, adding that despite having “more problems pointed out than any other force”, it remains “very defensive about external influence”.
Other forces, including less diverse rural ones, are described as more willing to seek outside advice.

For a force of its size and influence, the findings raise serious questions about how deeply reform has taken hold, the report concludes.
The Metropolitan Police has been approached for comment.
Significant gaps remain. Intersectionality is largely absent, while incomplete data limits a clear understanding of who is most affected and how.
With central funding for the ISOB having ended on 31 March, there is no clear plan for what follows, raising concerns about whether even limited progress can be sustained.
The recommendations are directed at national policing bodies, the Home Office and oversight institutions. They include embedding race equity into inspection frameworks, introducing enforceable standards, improving data collection and ensuring scrutiny is independent and properly funded.
After five years, the report makes clear that the structures needed to deliver meaningful change are still not fully in place.
The Home Office has been approached for comment.
Got a news tip or story idea? Submit it via this form. Reader feedback and corrections are welcomed separately here.






GOOD NEWS SOMEBODY LISTENED
-------------
From: REPARATION NATION LIMITED IC3CSI <thereparationnation@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 at 00:18
Subject: IC3CSI Engagement Position Paper – Relationship to ICOF / COWG and the Police Race Action Plan (PRAP)
To: <hello@actionforraceequality.org.uk>, <Kundai@actionforraceequality.org.uk>, <APAInfo@protonmail.com>, <info@npcc.police.uk>, <wearelistening@npcc.police.uk>
Wednesday, 26 November 2025
IC3CSI
IC3 Crime Scene Investigators
Reparation Nation Limited
23 Jersey House
2 Eastfield Road
Enfield
EN3 5UY
United Kingdom
Email: thereparationnation@gmail.com
Telephone: +44 7874 338 512
Website: https://ic3csi.com
To:
Action for Race Equality (ARE)
200a Pentonville Road
London
N1 9JP
United Kingdom
Action for Race Equality
Alliance for Police Accountability (APA)
c/o Action for Race Equality
200a Pentonville Road
London
N1 9JP
United Kingdom
National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC)
50 Broadway
London
SW1H 0BL
United Kingdom
Action for Race Equality
By email: hello@actionforraceequality.org.uk; Kundai@actionforraceequality.org.uk; APAInfo@protonmail.com; info@npcc.police.uk; wearelistening@npcc.police.uk
Action for Race Equality
Subject: IC3CSI Engagement Position Paper – Relationship to ICOF / COWG and the Police Race Action Plan (PRAP)
Our Ref: IC3CSI/ICOF-COWG-PRAP/2025-11-26
Your Ref: [To be allocated]
Dear colleagues,
I write as Mr John Canoe (IC3 – Black European), Investigating Officer for IC3 Crime Scene Investigators (ic3csi), on behalf of IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black taxpayers who are directly affected by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) Police Race Action Plan (PRAP) and by the emerging proposals for an Independent Community Oversight Framework (ICOF) and Community Oversight Working Group (COWG).
Please find enclosed the “IC3CSI Engagement Position Paper (National Level): IC3CSI and the Independent Community Oversight Framework (ICOF) / Community Oversight Working Group (COWG) for the NPCC Police Race Action Plan (PRAP)”. This position paper explains how ic3csi understands and relates to the ICOF / COWG proposals, and why our work is directed towards the longer-term establishment of the IC3 Black International State (IBIS) as the only fully safe solution until institutional racism and anti-Black racism are structurally addressed with proven safeguards.
In particular, the enclosed document sets out:
How ic3csi reads the ICOF / COWG proposals as an important experiment in national oversight that still sits inside a wider policing environment repeatedly found to be institutionally racist.
Why IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black people must currently treat PRAP and any associated oversight arrangements as initiatives under investigation rather than final solutions.
How ic3csi is building independent Black-led protection and reparatory structures – the Black Taxpayer Protection Plan, the Black Reparation Bank (Reparation Ledger) and the ic3 Black International State (IBIS) – alongside any engagement with ICOF and PRAP.
The conditions under which ic3csi can safely and honestly cooperate with ICOF / COWG from an IC3/IC6 taxpayer perspective.
From my standpoint as an IC3 Black person who has been classified as disabled by IC1 White people, and in light of my experiences across UK systems (including justice and mental health), I have to proceed on the basis that institutional racism and anti-Black racism remain live and unresolved risks. For that reason, ic3csi’s mandate is to insist on written records, clear safeguards and independent Black authority wherever decisions affect IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black people.
In line with this, I would be grateful if you could:
Confirm safe receipt of this letter and the attached IC3CSI Engagement Position Paper.
Explain, in writing, what specific safeguards you currently have in place within ARE, APA, NPCC, PRAP and any emerging ICOF / COWG structures to protect IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black people in your decision-making processes. This includes:
How key decision-makers are identified and held to account.
How equality and anti-racism impacts are assessed, recorded and reviewed over time.
How race and ethnicity data are collected and classified, particularly for IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black people.
Indicate how you propose to involve ic3csi in future discussions about the governance, data standards and evaluation of ICOF / COWG and PRAP, on the understanding that ic3csi will also be recording and evaluating your actions independently within the Black Reparation Ledger for potential review by IBIS in due course.
For transparency and safety, ic3csi representatives will not voluntarily meet police officers, or any other entities suspected of anti-Black racism, face-to-face. All communications must therefore be in writing (email or post) so that there is a clear evidential record. This policy reflects our role representing IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black people and ongoing concerns about anti-Black racism and institutional racism. If officers or other parties approach us in person unprompted, that is a different matter; however, any formal engagement should still be confirmed and followed up in writing.
Please send all replies and official correspondence by email to thereparationnation@gmail.com and by post to:
IC3CSI
23 Jersey House
2 Eastfield Road
Enfield
EN3 5UY
United Kingdom
I look forward to your written response and to understanding how you intend to ensure that IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black taxpayers are genuinely safeguarded, not only in principle but in the detailed operation of ICOF, COWG and the Police Race Action Plan.
Yours faithfully,
Mr John Canoe (IC3 – Black European)
Investigating Officer
IC3 Crime Scene Investigators (ic3csi)
Reparation Nation Limited
IC3CSI Donation Policy:
We provide free support to IC3 Black and IC6 Mixed-Black people affected by anti-Black racism trauma. Gifts and donations help us continue our work. Each email (incoming or outgoing) requires a £66 donation. This covers the time needed to open, read, analyse and process communication, as well as the work requested. Please make every communication count and send only carefully considered messages.
Disclaimer: IC3CSI is not a law firm. We provide research and document support only, and accept donations for these services.
--
REPARATION NATION LIMITED
IC3CSI Black Crime Scene Investigators
23 Jersey House
2 Eastfield Road
Enfield
EN3 5UY
Website: ic3csi.com (in development)
Company number: 14761041
Bank Account: 8367 4721
Sort Code: 51-61-34
This comes as no big surprise, engagement is an issue, trust and confidence is an issue. So how can forces improve if they are not willing to engage and commit to the community they serve. Education, hierarchical cultural change and community engagement must be at the forefront of moving forward and only then will results change. 👍